Anything worth talking about, is worth blogging about

At least he’s honest:

The goal is to get government money out of the abortion process and if contraceptive services have to suffer a bit of collateral damage in the process, so be it. When The Texas Tribune asked state Rep. Wayne Christian (R-Nacogdoches), a supporter of the family planning cuts, if this was a war on birth control, he said “yes.”

“Well of course this is a war on birth control and abortions and everything, that’s what family planning is supposed to be about,” Christian said.

Family planning clinics are routinely referred to by many Texas Republican legislators as “abortion clinics” even though none of the 71 family planning clinics in the state that receive government funding provide abortions. Texas and federal law prohibits that, but most women’s health clinics will refer women or teens who want an abortion to a provider.

“They’re sitting here, referring women out to receive abortions,” Christian said in an interview with NPR. “Those are the clinics, including Planned Parenthood, we were targeting.”

If he truly wanted to eliminate abortion, he’d be pushing birth control endlessly.

When people like me say that the religious right and faux–lifers are really motivated by a desire to control women, we’re not kidding. People like Wayne Christian really are reactionaries who want women back in their homes.

Comments on: "Why not just admit that you want women barefoot and pregnant?" (4)

  1. Jesus Christ, what does this guy want? He claims to want women to not have abortions. So, he only allows government funding to clinics that don’t perform abortions. Okay. At least I understand his reasoning on that one. The evidence doesn’t really exist to support it, but I can at least see his logic.

    But, then he wants to eliminate all forms of birth control and education on how to have safer sex? That will produce the opposite of his professed goal.

    Wait. Did I say “will”? This is Texas. It already has.

  2. You’ve posted that chart here before. I’ve read it before.

  3. Then now you have understanding. Now you understand that he is merely using abortion as a way to rile up people’s emotions, and can now see his true agenda (or, to be charitable, that he is hopelessly incoherent).

Feel free to leave a reply.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: